data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09d0f/09d0fb27d9eb95554d96f69060bfd0bda19937cd" alt=""
I hope to have other reviews of the reading from other attendees soon.
The evening was introduced by Plath's daughter, Frieda Hughes, who was dressed in a black cocktail dress and gold belt. She repeated much of the introduction to the Restored Ariel and was particularly keen to emphasize that Hughes took a "painstaking" approach to the 1965 edition. Frieda stressed that she sees Plath's ordering of the Ariel poems as the "historical version" and is convinced that Plath would have changed, adapted & extracted if she had lived longer, i.e. we shouldn't see it - in Frieda's view - as an incontrovertible original version. She said her mother "treated every emotional experience as a jewel, ring or a necklace" and that in the Ariel collection "she was caught in an act of revenge" in which her father later became a victim. She didn't mention the fact that Plath killed herself, but spoke of her death. Frieda complained that her mother has sometimes been "completely fabricated" and ended by saying the evening was an opportunity to hear her mother "presented exactly as she would want to be - through her poetry".
The forty readings followed, which lasted about an hour and a half. The poems of the Restored edition were read by a mixture of poets (Jo Shalcott, Gillian Clarke, Lavinia Greenlaw) and well-known actresses (Miranda Richardson, Juliet Stevenson, Anna Chancellor). It was a mixed bag I felt: ''Poppies in October" (one of my favourite poems) was terrible, read almost in monotone, "Medusa" was read breathily & quietly & with too little animation. But what was extraordinary was to hear the bee cycle and follow the narrative in its tense movement towards spring - this was a fantastic experience. The highlight for me was hearing Ruth Fainlight (on stage, with a walking stick) reading "Elm" - the poem Plath dedicated to her; and when the lights of the Royal Festival Hall were dimmed, Plath's image was beamed onto the screen and her voice came booming out of the speakers, reading "Daddy". Ultimately, I think, Plath herself is the best speaker of her poetry. But this was still a great opportunity to hear her poems as she said she wrote them - for the ear.
I really enjoyed reading your review So true about the reading of Poppies in October!
ReplyDeleteIs there a video of the reading? I'd like to know how Juliet Stevenson did in her reading of "Tulips?"
ReplyDeleteHi Anonymous. As far as I know it was not recorded (video or otherwise).
ReplyDeleteThere is a brief bit about the Stevenson reading here: http://willtherebefire.blogspot.co.uk/.
pks
"Poppies in October" is a favorite of mine too. I will hold the sound of it in my head.
ReplyDeleteThank you for that review.
Having now listened to a recording - don't ask, don't tell - I think Angel's review is spot-on. The recording of "Poppies in October" was ab-sol-ute-ly ru-ined by the ro-bo-tic and ter-ri-bly- bor-ing re-cit-a-tion of the po-em. Oh my god! Poor girl, I don't mean to be mean.
ReplyDeleteAnyway, it certainly appeared to have been a magical night. Wish I could have been there.