Skip to main content

Sylvia Plath Collections: "No"

There are a fair number of memories of Sylvia Plath in the Rosenstein collection now at Emory that are, for lack of a better way to put it, negative. I may be on an island about this, but I actually like that and appreciate it. I do not think Plath was a saint, and what I take away from these recollections is that she was, simply, complicated. That she made a different impression on different people throughout the course of her life is fine. I am also, possibly, on an island because the general tone of Bitter Fame is Olwynian, and I do not mind that book. For the simple fact that Sylvia Plath had flaws and I believe it is better to know them.

In yesterday's post I related two such negative comments on Plath by former housemate Lisa Levy and friend Clarissa Roche. There are a number of negative comments, too, about Plath's parenting (see Leonard Baskin and Nancy Axworthy, among others).

In addition to the positive and negative memories that Rosenstein (and others) have recorded, there is a third category of memory: those who refuse to give them. Two people that opted not to answer any questions, though they had the decency to respond to inquiry letters, are Carol LeVarn McCabe and Richard Norton. Both were parodied in The Bell Jar, as Doreen and Buddy Willard, respectively.

In the Knopf folder (Box 1, Folder 1), McCabe wrote on 28 June 1974:
It is a source of deepening depression to learn the number of ambitious persons who are anxious to use Sylvia Plath's life for their own personal gain, as she used our distress for hers.
Perhaps that's a kind of Amerlit justice. Be that as it may, I want no part of it and my answer to you is the same as my answer to the other hundreds of hopefuls who have written similar letters: No.
Rosenstein wrote to Richard Norton in 1971 and 1973 and received two replies declining to help. In the first instance, Norton replied that he has "a firm policy of not discussing Sylvia Plath". In the second instance Rosenstein asked specifically about their experience of seeing a baby born and working on cadavers. She was hopeful he might write his memories---anonymously if so desired---for a book that, like her biography of Plath, was never accomplished. He wrote that he did not have the time to help her and claimed "I recall no details of her watching either a birth or dissection".

Boston Lying-In Hospital
Plath visited the Boston Lying-In hospital with Norton on 1 February 1952. She was home after taking finals in January, between semesters. She wrote about going with Norton in a letter to Ann Davidow-Goodman, saying "Dick & I stood two feet away to watch a baby born" (Letters, Volume I, 416). She held test tubes for blood being drawn and later found out Norton was not a virgin. A few years later, Plath wrote to Gordon Lameyer on 6 February 1954 that two experiences she can lay claim to was "seeing a baby born . . . [and] cutting up the lungs of a human cadaver" (680). Plath mentioned both events, too, in her Smith College scrapbook on page 5. Featured on that page is a photograph of the said Norton dissecting lungs...


While Norton had memories to give he chose not to do so, which we must respect, he has maintained a steadfast silence---which has lasted as long as Warren Plath's. McCabe reversed her 1970s decision when she opened up and spoke to Elizabeth Winder for her Pain, Parties, Work (2013).

All links accessed 28 January 2020.

Comments

  1. Wow! Dying to hear what people said about her parenting.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Ack. You should write mysteries. Cliff hangers on each post.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous: Well, there is praise and criticism but I know the topic is currently being researched by someone so do not want to go into too much detail here as I think the impact will be greater in said research. Hope that makes sense. If I was more cutthroat I'd spill all the details. ~pks

    ReplyDelete
  4. Rebecca D: Thank you for your comment! I hope you are enjoying the posts. Feel free please to get into contact if you want more information on anything via the Contact Me link in the sidebar. ~pks

    ReplyDelete
  5. I also really like that! There is a tendency on social media to victimize Plath. Because (very) young people tend to strongly identify with her and mostly see her as this poor woman, screwed over by Hughes. There are numerous Facebook groups glorifying her and calling her a “saint“, mostly by people who hardly read anything on her.
    I think that young people want to identify so strongly with her that they take a certain aspect of her personality or biography and make her infallible in a way.

    In my opinion, memories that are on a rather negative side only add to her complex persona and make her even more human.
    And let’s be honest. No one is or was ever liked by everybody. We meet people in certain situations and leave certain impressions, some positive, some negative.
    Also, everyone has their flaws. And if you have people around you who truly appreciate and know you, they tend to accept these flaws and the memories of these people would probably strongly differ from those of people that only knew you vaguely.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Thank you for this post.

    I admire Sylvia Plath a great deal, her poetry and journals mostly, but when reading her, it's simply obvious that she was a very difficult person to be with.

    It's true that people tend to become a bit blind when it comes to someone they admire (I also see this tendency with Virginia Woolf or Simone de Beauvoir for instance, whom I also deeply admire)

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Famous Quotes of Sylvia Plath

Sylvia Plath inspires us all in various and wonderful ways. She is in many respects a form of comfort to us, which is something that Esther Greenwood expresses in The Bell Jar , about a bath: "There must be quite a few things a hot bath won't cure, but I don't know many of them. Whenever I'm sad I'm going to die, or so nervous I can't sleep, or in love with somebody I won't be seeing for a week, I slump down just so far and then I say: 'I'll go take a hot bath.'" We read and remember Sylvia Plath for many reasons, many of them deeply personal and private. But we commemorate her, too, in very public ways, as Anna of the long-standing Tumblr Loving Sylvia Plath , has been tracking, in the form of tattoos. (Anna's on Instagram with it too, as SylviaPlathInk .) The above bath quote is among Sylvia Plath's most famous. It often appears here and there and it is stripped of its context. But I think most people will know it is from her nove...

Some final photographs of Sylvia Plath

Susan O'Neill-Roe took a series of photographs of Sylvia Plath and her children from October to late November (or maybe early December) 1962 while she was a day nanny/mother's help at Court Green. From nearby Belstone , it was a short drive to North Tawton and the aid she provided enabled Plath to complete the masterful October and November poems and also to make day or overnight trips to London for poetry business and other business.  Some of O'Neill-Roe's photographs are well-known.  However, a cache of photographs formed a part of the papers of failed biographer Harriet Rosenstein. They were sold separately from the rest of her papers that went to Emory. I was fortunate enough to see low resolution scans of them a while back so please note these are being posted today as mere reference quality images.  There are two series here. The first of the children with Plath dressed in red and black. (This should be referred to in the future, please, as Plath's  Stendhal-c...

Sylvia Plath's Gravestone Vandalized

The following news story appeared online this morning: HEPTONSTALL, ENGLAND (APFS) - The small village of Heptonstall is once again in the news because of the grave site of American poet Sylvia Plath. The headstone controversy rose to a fever pitch in 1989 when Plath's grave was left unmarked for a long period of time after vandals repeatedly chiseled her married surname Hughes off the stone marker. Author Nick Hornby commented, "I like Plath, but the controversy reaching its fever pitch in the 80s had nothing to do with my book title choice." Today, however, it was discovered that the grave was defaced but in quite an unlikely fashion. This time, Plath's headstone has had slashed-off her maiden name "Plath," so the stone now reads "Sylvia Hughes." A statement posted on Twitter from @masculinistsfortedhughes (Masculinists for Ted Hughes) has claimed responsibility saying that, "We did this because as Ted Hughes' first wife, Sylvia de...